sci.physics.particle

On Mar 26, 5:48=A0am, "Pmb" wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news:f4d1cb91-a8de-4847-8a80-009869c28d5d@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 25, 5:46 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 8:33 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > When inside the nucleus protons and neutrons have less mass than when
> > > unbound. When the nucleons become bound part of their mass becomes the=

> > > binding energy of the strong force holding them together. Upon leaving=

> > > the nucleus they get back their mass. The binding energy mass goes
> > > back into the protons and neutrons as they leave the strong force's
> > > range.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
>
> > You know this because of this evidence?
>
> > Harry C.
>
> > p.s., Mitch, have you ever though about stamp collecting as a hobby,
> > rather than posting nonsense on sci.physics?
>
> > Harry C.
> >Nucleons outside of the nucleus measure as more massive. That their
> >mass becomes the binding eneergy of the strong force is my theory. It
> >is rather straightforword if I may say so myself. :-)
>
> >Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
>
> This is very wrong. You're confusing the mass of the nucleons with the mas=
s
> of the fields holding the nucleus together. The fields themselves have mas=
s
> and that is the source of the mass defect.
>
> Pete- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-------------
very nice
i can see some advance

NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !! (said old Catto (:-)
even fields has mass !!
the same as photons =3D has mass
and there is just one kind of mass ......
and the above nuclear procecess are just *one*
of the proves for it !.

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------