sci.physics.particle

On Mar 1, 6:03=A0pm, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 1 mar, 10:35, higis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 1, 11:01 pm, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > Does your web site have summary of it or free chapters?
>
> > > Here is the page describing the book
>
> > >http://pages.globetrotter.net/srp/geomax2a.htm
>
> > > The intro is there, as well as the presentation speech at
> > > congress-2000, and one appendix on the state of physics.
>
> > > > So you live in Canada. Well. How about this. I'd send
> > > > you amazon email gift cheque as payment then you
> > > > sent it to my country.
>
> > > I'm afraid I don't use amazon much. Where do you live ?
>
> > Near the amazon jungle.
>
> > > > What do you mean you couldn't explain this without
> > > > very extensive set up. It means your book has
> > > > details of them that you can't share in short
> > > > messages?
>
> > > Not at all. Only that I don't really care spending
> > > hours at the keyboard explaining every detail from
> > > the ground up.
>
> > > This is a complete model. Not just some patchwork
> > > of disjointed ideas.
>
> > > Would you consider explaining all of SR and GR
> > > on a newsgroup to someone who doesn't have
> > > the faintest idea of curved geometry ?
>
> > > I did discuss just about every aspect of it here
> > > over the course of the past 10 years. Never made
> > > any secret about it.
>
> > Ok. If I have time. I'll go over your 10 years of debates
> > with all the physicists.
>
> Well, have fun then.
>
> You won't be disappointed. They all said that what
> I said was bull and that I was a crackpot, when not
> worse.
>
> Actually, I seldom discussed with them as you will
> see, and definetely never with uncivil jerks. I warned
> them once and if they persisted (they can't control
> their bad manners apparently) they were excluded
> for good.
>
> Bad manners seems to be an integral part of the
> Copenhagen bunch training. None of them seems to
> have skipped even one lecture.
>
> They typically barged into my conversations
> with others to warn them of my ignorance and not
> to listen to me.
>
> > Maybe you are the greatest genius who ever lived
> > who has overtaken Dirac, Heisenberg, Born,
> > Pauli, Gell-man, and other physics giants.
>
> No sirry bob. Just a regular Joe that simply doesn't
> go for irrationality. The stuff has been there for
> decades for all in the community to see. If only
> even one of them had used common sense he
> would have come up with it.
>
> There is only one shortest way for going from A to B.
>
> > I mentioned great genius because you beat all of them
> > in one stroke. Anyway.
>
> Come on! Heap of baloney.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Right now I have to learn some new cooking technique
> > from my mentor because there is a big reception
> > coming up in 2 weeks so I'm quite busy.
>
> > > > Well. If that's the case I only need
> > > > to know this initial fact for startup (before
> > > > getting your book in weeks). The proton has
> > > > 2 up quarks.
>
> > > Yes.
> >
>
> You bet.
>
> Andr=E9 Michaud- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--------------
how can a 'point particle '
rotate around an axis ?? (:-)

and more peculiar arounf two axis??
2
as you told me the quark is only about 3 persent mass
of the nucleid
so do you callit a complete theory
while 90 percent is mumble jumble abou tthe missing 90 percent of
mass??

i has a glimps in th e link you quoted from youself
you didnt innovate anything new
the only thing i agree with you is your
end conclsutions;
that the existing situation is
far far from the real story !!
and just apoor mathematical model

ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------------