Group: sci.physics.particle
From: "Y.Porat"
Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:44 AM
Subject: Re: Binding Energy Question

On Feb 27, 11:46=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Feb 27, 12:29 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 27, 9:01 am, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On 27 f=E9v, 01:17, higis wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 27, 12:19 pm, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > On 26 f=E9v, 22:10, higis wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 27, 10:27 am, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On 26 f=E9v, 20:43, higis wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Feb 27, 12:04 am, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On 26 f=E9v, 09:16, higis wrote:
>


> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > ---------------
> > well Andre
> > you are making progress .......
>
> > 2
> > we must come tothe conclusion that
> > th eelectron is not a 'finit point particle'
> > but composed of subparticles !!
> > (probably in a chain )
>
> > Y.Porat
> > ---------------------------
>
> ....and what is your evidence for this?-
----------------------
you cant play a double game with me!
if i am a nothing for you -
dont ask me questions and dont discuss with me
2
if at the end of the day i seem for you
an interesting thinker

you have to behave accordingly
you cant hold the long string on both of its edges

3
if soemone else will ask me
i will try to answer

Y.Porat
------------------------------


Safety Articles | News in English | 20lbs in 30 days | Bluegrass | Usenet Newsfeeds