sci.physics.electromag

Dear Szczepan Bia3ek:

"Szczepan Bia3ek" wrote in message
news:fttmuk$ggu$1@node1.news.atman.pl...
>
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote
> news:6_qMj.48$nr1.12@newsfe13.phx...
>> Dear Szczepan Bia3ek:
>>
>> "Szczepan Bia3ek" wrote in message
>> news:ftsj2g$7dr$1@node1.news.atman.pl...
>> ...
>>> Most evidences commonly known prove that
>>> electrons are particles. I do not know even
>>> one that prove that photons exist.
>>
>> "photoelectric effect".
>
> Earier I wrote:"In optics no photons. There are
> the packets. The Newton rings allow us to
> calculate how long they are. About 200 wave
> lengths.
>
> "photoelectric effect". you can explain with the
> packets. Try the next.

Wave behavior fails to describe the photoelectric effect. Wave
behavior predicts resonance, and cutoff both above and below
resonance. This does not occur above resonance in the
photoelectric effect. Additionally, wave behavior describes
"dispersion", yet the photoelectric effect works for individual
photons emitted from distant stars, and detected one-at-a-time
(like with the VLBA).

You can try next, because you failed this one.

David A. Smith