humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

________________________________________________________________

Ok, it's probably not Oxford's portrait because the sitter is wearing
a London mayor's chain of office around his waist indicating that the
original [later altered to make it look like
'Hamlet''] was probably of Hammersley.

Nevertheless, the fact that 'Oxford's' portrait
is featured on Encarta and not the Chandos
or Droeshout, kind of signals the end of
Stratfordianism, doesn't it?




So the question is, do you think that this
outburst of support for Oxfordianism is
the endgame for Stratfordianism?

Does Stratfordianism still have a chance
to sett the record aright on Looney's
multitudious fatal errors about the Historical
Oxford or is it too late to turn this around?