humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

"The Historian" wrote in message
news:aefcda26-8e2a-4684-bbcf-acbaec4b6da6@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> On Feb 6, 5:59 am, "Paul Crowley"

>> Most likely, neither is true. Their minds
>> are empty, and they just mouth whatever
>> they think is fashionable. One of these
>> days they'll be telling us that they were
>> always, at bottom, Oxfordians, and that
>> their Stratfordianism was merely a
>> pretence to encourage discussion.

> This is classic Crowley, assuming that because I reject his silly
> scatology in his tortured readings of the sonnets that I reject all
> scatology. But what can you expect from a rigidnik?

What a liar!

Brennan doesn't even know the Sonnet
nor the line, with my reading of which he
says he disagrees. He's probably never
even read it. He's certainly never
commented upon any reading of it.
In any case, his comments upon any of
the Sonnets are rare, and are invariably
in the form that he thinks constitutes
a joke.

He latched on to the scatology -- having
been told by someone else -- and, boy,
has he hammered it since!


Paul.