Gordon Sollars wrote:
> In article
> mark@myinboxisbroken.com says...
>
>>Gordon Sollars wrote:
>>
>>>So, once again, you go back to the definition of certainty that you have
>>>claimed to reject: all the evidence in favor and none against. [...]
>>
>>That supposed criterion for certainty is so *ridiculous* that it's
>>really an insult to attribute it to anyone -- unless the person in
>>question has actually stated that that's his criterion.
>
> Oh, come now, Mark, you have seen much worse insults here on HPO. ;-)
No doubt! :-)
Mark
x
x