humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Apr 6, 11:47=EF=BF=BDam, Tom Reedy wrote:
> On Apr 6, 10:58 am, Art Neuendorffer
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > =EF=BF=BDJim KQKnave wrote:
>
> > > > Neuendorffer, Lyra and lackpurity were posting excessively
> > > > long, long before I decided to fight back.
>
> > .
>
> > Tom Reedy wrote:
>
> > > Lyra mostly confines herself to her own threads, and
> > > =EF=BF=BDsometimes she posts some interesting information
> > > =EF=BF=BDthat we'd've missed if she hadn't put it up.
>
> > wE'D'VE REgreted it if we had.
>
> > ___ =EF=BF=BD *LYRA UPTICK*
> > ___ =EF=BF=BD *LACKPURITY*
> > .> =EF=BF=BDJim KQKnave wrote:
>
> > > > I only post over their posts, so if they don't post, I don't.
>
> > .Tom Reedy wrote:
>
> > > If that were true, I doubt anyone would object; I know I wouldn't.
> > > But that's obviously not true. You start new threads every day.
>
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > Isn't language wonderfully ambiguous!
>
> > Here Jim is talking about Stratfordian posts having to be
> > at the TOP of the list of HLAS threads and Tom interprets him
> > to mean Strat posts on TOP of other's posts within a thread.
>
> Ah, I see what he meant now. I take it for some reason there's an
> idiotic contest to be at the top of the Goggle page. I suppose there's
> no accounting for the search for fame and domination, no matter how
> that might be defined.
>
> I think it would be better if he posted on top of your or MM's
> messages within the thread.
>
> TR

MM:
We might learn from the experience of Edward de Vere. Yes, I mean the
infamous tennis court fiasco. He challenged them, and he lost. The
conflict with him just made the teachings more well known.

Maharaj Ji Charan Singh used to say that if Christ had not been
crucified, he would not have been nearly so popular.

Michael Martin

> > That's why literary 'history' is so unscientific & subjective.
>
> > Art Neuendorffer- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -