humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Apr 6, 10:58 am, Art Neuendorffer
wrote:
> > Jim KQKnave wrote:
>
> > > Neuendorffer, Lyra and lackpurity were posting excessively
> > > long, long before I decided to fight back.
>
> .
>
> Tom Reedy wrote:
>
> > Lyra mostly confines herself to her own threads, and
> > sometimes she posts some interesting information
> > that we'd've missed if she hadn't put it up.
>
> wE'D'VE REgreted it if we had.
>
> ___ *LYRA UPTICK*
> ___ *LACKPURITY*
> .> Jim KQKnave wrote:
>
> > > I only post over their posts, so if they don't post, I don't.
>
> .Tom Reedy wrote:
>
> > If that were true, I doubt anyone would object; I know I wouldn't.
> > But that's obviously not true. You start new threads every day.
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Isn't language wonderfully ambiguous!
>
> Here Jim is talking about Stratfordian posts having to be
> at the TOP of the list of HLAS threads and Tom interprets him
> to mean Strat posts on TOP of other's posts within a thread.

Ah, I see what he meant now. I take it for some reason there's an
idiotic contest to be at the top of the Goggle page. I suppose there's
no accounting for the search for fame and domination, no matter how
that might be defined.

I think it would be better if he posted on top of your or MM's
messages within the thread.

TR

>
> That's why literary 'history' is so unscientific & subjective.
>
> Art Neuendorffer