Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
From: Art Neuendorffer
Date: Sunday, April 06, 2008 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: No, wasn't Oxford (or Marlowe or Bacon), and Shakespeare did not have to visit Venice

> Jim KQKnave wrote:
> >
> > Neuendorffer, Lyra and lackpurity were posting excessively
> > long, long before I decided to fight back.
.
Tom Reedy wrote:
>
> Lyra mostly confines herself to her own threads, and
> sometimes she posts some interesting information
> that we'd've missed if she hadn't put it up.

wE'D'VE REgreted it if we had.

___ *LYRA UPTICK*
___ *LACKPURITY*
.
> Jim KQKnave wrote:
> >
> > I only post over their posts, so if they don't post, I don't.
.
Tom Reedy wrote:
>
> If that were true, I doubt anyone would object; I know I wouldn't.
> But that's obviously not true. You start new threads every day.
-------------------------------------------------
Isn't language wonderfully ambiguous!

Here Jim is talking about Stratfordian posts having to be
at the TOP of the list of HLAS threads and Tom interprets him
to mean Strat posts on TOP of other's posts within a thread.

That's why literary 'history' is so unscientific & subjective.

Art Neuendorffer