humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Feb 22, 2:06 pm, Elizabeth wrote:
> On Feb 22, 1:45 pm, Art Neuendorffer
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Art Neuendorffer wrote:
>
> > > > Elizabeth caulks up another one:
>
> > .
>
> > Elizabeth wrote:
>
> > > Thank you?
>
> > CAULK, v.t. In some parts of America, to set upon an ox shoes armed
> > with sharp points of iron, to prevent their slipping on ice; that is,
> > to stop from slipping.
> > .
>
> > Elizabeth wrote:
>
> > > Would you mind stating, in plain prose,
> > > what your theory is on the 'True' series?
>
> > > I would like to have a conversation
> > > without having to wade through piles of
> > > word debris.
>
> > Well, that's your problem right there, Elizabeth.
>
> > It's all about buzz words, code words, word games, etc.
> > ABSOLUTELY nothing is to be taken at face value.
>
> Yes, ARt, I know that but IN CONTEXT.
>
> CONTEXT IS ALL.
>
> You remove everything from context
> and then expect us to gasp with
> delight. We don't know what in hell
> you're talkin' about.
>
> The reason I am so intent on providing
> the historical context (in my amateurish
> sort of way) is because the problem of
> Shakespeare authorship will not be
> proven without the historical context .
> On tiny stinkin' historical fact can make
> all the difference between who did and
> who did not write the Shakespeare works.
>
> Francis Fukuyama was right, ideology
> IS the end of history because with ideology
> you can make any context you want.
>
> This is what the Strats have done so
> well for the past 400 years, they created
> an 'authorial context' for Shacksper, that
> context is now falling apart.
>
> What's ahead for the Looney Lobby is
> a CONTEXTUAL CORRECTION because
> Looney was DREAMING, Art. I studied
> the (boring as hell) Victorians (except for
> the scientists) and I know what Looney
> was up to. It isn't gonna stick, Art.

I defnitely need a new keyboard but I
am such a procrastinator. I'll try switching
keyboards I know I struck the 'e' key in
'on' abve.

Look at that. It happened again.