humanities.philosophy.objectivism

>> Brad Harrington wrote:
>> I don't know if that's what Charles is suggesting or not--but I would
>> say that such a suggestion is not as preposterous as you seem to think.

> Agent Cooper wrote:
> Well, the power to tax and spend doesn't specify what you can tax or
> what you can spend it on. I think mainstream doctrine in this case is
> probably right. I'm much more keen on restricted powers to regulate,
> which is different.

See what I mean?? Heh heh heh!!

> Then, the lawyer spoke up. "Yes," he said, "But who do you think
> created all of the chaos and confusion?"

Oh, sooooooo true... Here's a good example of that kind of "chaos and
confusion" to brighten up your day today...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcU4t6zRAKg


>> By the way, Coop, did I ever tell you the difference between a lawyer
>> and a catfish?? One is a scum-sucking bottom-dweller--and the other's
>> a fish....

> Speaking of fish, why don't we go out to lunch to celebrate my tenure?
> I'll buy.

Deal. Haven't seen you in quite some time. Got much going on personally;
I'll fill you in. Check your private email...

Brad Harrington