humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Apr 9, 9:03=EF=BF=BDam, John W Kennedy wrote:
> lackpurity wrote:
> > What do you know about dimensions?
>
> More than either John Baker or you, evidently.

MM:
Your ambiguities are REALLY old. What do you know about dimensions?
Do you know of another one, besides the physical one, with which we're
fairly familiar. For example, scientists can't explain how some UFOs
change shape. Can you?

> > Without mystic knowledge, there is
> > little to know or understand. =EF=BF=BDMystics can see the dimensions.
> > They're not guessing.

> Stop blaspheming. You know /nothing/ of mysticism. You may be able to
> fake it well enough to cheat senile widows out of their life savings,
> but you won't find any suckers for your con-game here.

The followers of the mystics are on a higher level. Why? Because,
unlike you, they recognize that they know very little about anything,
especially other dimensions. Clowns like you and Webb are always
stumbling over their own inflated egos. This is why Christ said, "The
least will be the greatest." That one is probably a tough one for
you, though.

Of course, you won't discuss your own philosophy, and one might wonder
why? You walk around with a big chip on your shoulder, but if I knock
it off, then you go into reticent mode. Let the readers cogitate that
one. Since you refuse to discuss things like a man, then your charge
of blasphemy goes out the window, IMO.

Michael Martin