On Apr 1, 7:39 pm, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote:
> One of Rand's major errors. Aesthetics is based on opinion, not fact.
Sigh. The Kolker algorithm is awake.
> Everyone on eath agrees that 1 + 1 = 2.
Is "everyone agrees" the meaning of objective?
If it is, then all you have to do to render something
"non objective" is disbelieve in it. What status would
that give to your strange little string of symbols?
There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who
understand binary numbers, and those who don't.
Socks