humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Feb 22, 11:15=EF=BF=BDam, Roundtable wrote:
> On 16 Feb., 07:19, Algernon H.Nuttsakk
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > When, WHEN, I ask you, will academia, with its
> > peer-reviewed puke, and its never-ending fauning
> > over Mozart, =EF=BF=BDever realize how UTTERLY DAFT IT
> > IS TO SUPPOSE THAT AN ASS-FONDUE-SMEARED GOAT FUCKER
> > LIKE WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE COULD HAVE WRITTEN THE
> > EXQUISITE LOVE DALLIANCES OF OUR MIDSUMMER'S DREAM????
>
> > Surely, Frost's penmanship resembles the frog
> > scratches we have come to know as the Strat man's
> > feeble "handwriting", which exists only in the form
> > of signatures involved in his speculative and somewhat
> > sad and lumpish business dealings. But Frost was hardly a
> > megagenius of the umptysquath magnitude that the
> > mighty Earl of Oxford was, a man who peppered his
> > plays with the most exquisitely erudite Latin, who
> > knew the topography of Italy like the back of his
> > tin mines, and whose academically detailed knowledge
> > of the law produced sonnet 46: "Defendent"! "Verdict"!
> > "Plea"! Who could have been more acquainted with this
> > specialized terminology than Oxford, a man with an M.A.!
> > I feel confident that when manuscript copies of
> > the Earl's plays do surface, signed with his immortal
> > name, the penmanship will be as clear a bell, with
> > curves that would delight a Rembrandt, and with "I"'s
> > dotted with the most fantastical and intricate fractal
> > conceptions! Surely you don't believe, you CAN'T believe,
> > that the Stratman, who, for a brief period in his
> > miserable existence managed to stand-in for the mighty
> > Earl, could have written anything more than a filthy
> > receipt for his shit-filled business dealings? The
> > Stratman, through an act of P.T. Barnumish
> > prestidigitation, managed to parlay his backwater
> > bullshit into immortality, and could not have written
> > the immortal Hamlet anymore than he could have
> > defecated a chocolate cake for the Queen's birthday,
> > although I'm sure he tried.
>
> > AHN
>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> > The original sender is unknown. =EF=BF=BDAny address shown in the From h=
eader
> > is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
> > than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visitwww.panta-rhei.eu.org
> > for abuse and hashcash info.
>
> Bugger off you foul-mouthed libel-spouting excrement on legs.
> And stop insulting Will of Stratford.
>
> RThttp://roundtable.iwarp.com

MM:
I'm sure God will give you credit for defending the Ever-Living Poet.
Thanks.

It's really amazing how people try to install Edward de Vere, William
Stanley, and a host of others on Shakespeare's throne. His extern'
was honored. Nobody is even close to him, with the exceptions of
Francis Bacon and Countess of Pembroke, Mary Sidney Herbert. Both
wrote their own works. Francis Bacon even advised us to honor thy
predecessors, or you would repent in the end.

If his extern' was honored, then OBVIOUSLY, everybody knew him. They
knew his identity. It was William Shakespeare of Stratford, a.k.a.
pleasant Willie, according to Edmund Spenser. It was only after 150
years, that some decided to fantasize, and Anti-Stratfordianism was
born. It would never have been considered earlier.

Michael Martin