humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Apr 9, 10:49=EF=BF=BDam, Dominic Hughes wrote:
> On Apr 7, 1:05 am, Greg Reynolds wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 3:09 pm, Greg Reynolds wrote:
>
> > > Michael, are you game?
>
> > > i will present your own words tomorrow.
>
> > > You will either verify them
> > > OR
> > > you will retract them
> > > OR
> > > you will skulk off.
>
> > > Are you game?
> > > i will be using YOUR words, so there will be no surprises, no tricks.
>
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Greg Reynolds
>
> > Well, Michael, you didn't say if you were Game for the challenge of
> > substantiating your own words.
>
> > You might be in persecution mode again, a great contrast to just two
> > days ago when you were begging for a fight; you bragged you could
> > "defeat" JWK and I quote...
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD"Is there no end to your pigeonholing, hit =
and run tactics?
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDYou need to make yourself clear. =
=EF=BF=BDDefine what is Satanic
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDand what is not, for a start, acc=
ording to you. =EF=BF=BDI suspect
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDthat I can defeat you. =EF=BF=BDG=
ame? =EF=BF=BDLOL =EF=BF=BDHere's your chance."
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =
=EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD-Michael Martin
>
> > It isn't clear how you could "defeat" a person when it is you taunting
> > him to give the yet unknown definition, but I see you fully understand
> > the Game. Now you will play. And unlike when you picked that fight,
> > there will be no taunting here--you only need explain your own words!
>
> > As a special feature for you Michael who has never truly argued your
> > positions, you can select the skill level you feel is most appropriate
> > to your own credibility!
>
> > If you mean what you say but only once in a while, try the Beginner
> > question.
>
> > If you know what you are talking about and are always available
> > elaborate, go for Intermediate.
>
> > If you are prepared to actually defend your viewpoint, Michael, select
> > Expert.
>
> > If you find that you cannot substantiate your words, Michael, simply
> > retract them. Be honest with us and you will make sense!
>
> > BEGINNER QUESTION
> > In a single post, Michael, you made these conflicting statements:
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD"I guess we have different POVs. =EF=BF=BDTo me, it s=
eems that
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDOxfordianism has been defeated rather sound=
ly."
> > AND
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD"That's nice, because I doubt if there will be any
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDwinners in our lifetime."
>
> > Which of these POVs then is the prevailing MM POV and why?
>
> > INTERMEDIATE QUESTION
> > Michael, you tell us that:
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD"Some of us like to give credence to evidence,
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDand others like to have a free reign to fan=
tasize
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDto their heart's content."
>
> > Can you provide examples of each and tell us
> > which category includes you?
>
> > EXPERT QUESTION
> > Michael, you claim
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD"Shakespeare was Socrates."
>
> > Why do you believe this and what evidence supports your belief?
>
> > That's it!
> > What you may lack in purity, you can certainly make up in clarity just
> > by verifying or retracting. What's it going to be?
>
> > Your reader,
> > Greg Reynolds
>
> Of course, Curiosity (f/k/a lacksanity) won't discuss these questions,
> and one might wonder why? =EF=BF=BDThe Cat Guru walks around with a big ch=
ip
> on his shoulder, but if you knock it off, then he goes into reticent
> mode. =EF=BF=BDLet the readers cogitate that one. =EF=BF=BDSince he refuse=
s to discuss
> things like a man, then his speculations go out the window, IMO.
>
> Since he thinks his crazy beliefs are gospel truth, then I think the
> thing to do in a discussion group like this, is for him to analyze and
> explain his own beliefs. =EF=BF=BDI wonder if he will continue to hide in
> reticent mode now and never choose to answer one of your questions.
> Will he ever go over his own beliefs with a fine-tooth comb. =EF=BF=BDHa!
> That should be very interesting. =EF=BF=BDI think you'll be waiting a very=

> long time for his reply.

MM:
I replied to Greg's questions.

Michael Martin

> Dom
>
> ...Helter skelter, hang sorrow, care will kill a cat, up-tails all,
> and a pox on the hangman.
> Ben Jonson in Every Man in His Humour- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -