humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Mar 25, 12:08=EF=BF=BDpm, Elizabeth wrote:
> __________________________________________________________________________=
_=EF=BF=BD____
>
> Last week we were given a break on the fake headers
> and home page spamming. =EF=BF=BDI don't know why, perhaps
> the posters were busy elsewhere.
>
> Last week the 'views' went way up overall, my posts got
> over 70 view, the daily views of the homepage was the
> highest I've seen in a year.
>
> This week, a real, hand-crafted post on an actual =EF=BF=BDsubject
> had to compete with Art's
>
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=
=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD EIGHTEEN
>
> headers on the HLAS homepage in one screen shot. =EF=BF=BDJim's
> headers made up the difference, there was only one
> new (real) post or reply on the page.
>
> There's a statistical relationship between the abuse
> of this forum and the number of views this forum will
> get, this week the views are less than half than last
> week, my 'views' dropped to less than half.
>
> I can see a motive for Neundorffer to sabotage this
> forum, it's 'humanities dot lit dot authors dot
> SHAKESPEARE' not 'Oxford' but I don't know why
> the Strats have abused it nearly out of existence.

MM:
You mean Anti-Strats, such as Neuendorffer, I hope?

> This is all there is. =EF=BF=BDIt's obvous that the Strats don't
> have enough energy to fight back, they seem
> demoralized. =EF=BF=BD

MM:
I contribute what I can, time permitting. I asked Neuendorffer, for
example, where Oxford was hiding for eight years? No response as yet,
despite his more than 20,000 posts. I mentioned that it must have
been a rather HUGE sacrifice for him, to remain incognito while
writing the canon, then dying. Maybe he has no significant reply?

>Itook down the page suggesting that
> they put up a website that would critique the
> Oxfordian case. No response. =EF=BF=BDPerhaps it's because
> I misspelled 'opinion' as 'onion' but isn't that
> beside the point?

MM:
Since KQKnave is always advertising his site, maybe he could add that
to his site, since he's already advertising it, anyway?

Michael Martin