Wow, you complain about a phony unsupportable title and the same
article comes out untitled.
Wow, you complain that another Oxfordian author falsely aligns
Shakespeare's lovers and marriages and you get a sink-hole of a
correction [See note 2 "performing the marriage OF TO Audrey to
William" ??? http://www.shakespearefellowship.org/Reviews/StritmatterAppleton.htm]
Did it eVER occur to Oxfordians they need a fact checker?
Why fight me when i declare your findings wrong, your statements
malicious, or your character assassinations foolish? You NEED somebody
aboard who knows how to read.
I see no need for kid gloves when certain people plan to destroy
Shakespeare.
I realize that Richard M. Waugaman '70 did not post his essay here for
my approval, but Roger Stritmatter posted it here and now Lyra has
posted it here sans misguided title.
So i feel fully within my rights to respond to it as though these are
Richard M. Waugaman '70's true beliefs that he wants to promote. A
small grace period will ensue to provide Dr. Waugaman the chance to
verify that he means what he says.
Let's just say the title isn't all that's in need of explanation/
clarification/retraction.
If defaming Shakespeare be your sport, let's see how good you are.
Greg Reynolds