humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:00:07 -0800 (PST), Greg Reynolds
wrote:

>Authorial Voice Crack'd:
>Oxfordian Falsehood on Display
>
>DAY SIX
>
>BUNK,
>deBUNKing,
>and BUNKer mentality
>
>
>I guess the Shakespeare Fellowship is really showing me who's boss:
>they will profess outright falsehood and there's nothing I can do
>about it.
>
>On the Shakespeare Fellowship website
>http://www.shakespearefellowship.org/Reviews/StritmatterAppleton.htm
>the Oxfordian conclusion is based on a mistruth that defames
>Shakespeare but promotes Oxford as author of As You Like It.
>
>That's right. By maliciously corrupting Shakespeare's masterpiece, and
>by redesigning the love affairs, and by ignoring one marriage and
>inventing another marriage to fit its own Oxfordian needs, this
>Oxfordian website pretends to educate us on Authorial Voice.
>
>It is Oxfordian thinking/comprehending/communicating all in one:
>http://www.shakespearefellowship.org/Reviews/StritmatterAppleton.htm
>
>Note the intent: propaganda to promote a prefabricated conclusion that
>Oxford wrote Shakespeare.
>
>If there is any other intent, SF, do tell!
>
>Though impossible in its content, this deceptive source is not even
>questioned by Oxfordians, and in fact has been available many years
>(copyright 1999) to mislead, to dumb down, to misinform, to distort,
>and to recruit the gullibly like-minded. How many Shakespeare lovers
>have already been cruelly misinformed by Roger's teachings?
>
>(Am I really the first to catch this gaffe, Roger, or are you living
>like twenty lies?)
>
>I have always treated Oxfordians better than they treat Shakespeare in
>that I have been honest.
>
>O, I like Roger and Lynne personally.
>O, I love Shakespeare.
>O, I hate seeing Shakespeare victimized by Oxfordian mistruth.
>SO, I will not be dissuaded from seeking fairness from my friends.
>
>Lynne and Roger need to take down their rotten website and thank me
>for keeping them honest on this one. They need not blame me for
>reading their contrivance and comprehending it as misleading and
>dangerous to the young. It is not a reliable understanding of
>Shakespeare's AYLI or of Authorial Voice. It is Oxfordian
>prevarication.
>
>I dare SF to tell HLAS how they manufactered this piece and how they
>think it supports Roger on Authorial Voice when he uses only his own
>goofy, misguided rendition of the play to yield his own flawed
>understanding. So what's to learn? Why have such a website? Lynne?
>Roger?
>
>Please just admit you (SF members who have read the site) never
>understood Touchstone anyway.
>
>Is that asking too much?
>That SF either defend or retract Roger words?
>
>Lynne said Roger is busy now.
>Too busy to stop deceiving his readers?
>That IS busy!!!
>
>Read As You Like It and then read note 2 of
>http://www.shakespearefellowship.org/Reviews/StritmatterAppleton.htm
>and you'll see that Authorial Voice has eluded Roger, Lynne, and the
>entire Shakespeare Fellowship for many years.
>
>And they intend to keep it that way.
>
>Greg Reynolds [2]
>
>
>2
>Greg's sobriquet accidentally furnishes the original for the Puritan
>bounty hunter Sir Perry d'Ox in 'Authorial Voice Crack'd' who performs
>the exorcism of the dastardly dishonest Shakespeare Fellowship over
>the vociferous objections of the authorial bullshit artist
>Stritmatter, a passage thought by Lynne Kositsky ("Believe Sweet
>Idiots and Children, We Must be Allowed our Falsehood, Or We Must Live
>in Reality," unpublished manuscript, presented whenever needed), among
>other SF members, to be a true repertory of their Oxfordian distortion
>of the Shakespeare play, symbolized in the figure of Lynne, gullibly
>gulling to the lulling of the doctor Roger.

From the deceptions practiced on the public as authorship attribution
disinformation, we might deduce hard evidence of suppressed
information developed by advanced technology, I think.

Consider the extent to which recent efforts by linguists using
styleometrics to analyze the canon has been sabotaged. We should also
ask what other technologies have dropped off the scientific radar
screen for no known reason, such as holography and reverse speech. No
telling what has been done to Stratman by conspirators, perhaps
including government military in the intelligence community.

I predict that Dr. S and Ms Mouse will make a coordinated attempt to
revise edited the Wiki article on S written by the Shakespeare Trust.
>+