humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare

On Feb 25, 2:35=A0pm, Tom Reedy wrote:
> The Shakespeare-Oxford Society (http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/) is
> apparently so full of morons they can't even find a member literate
> enough to edit their own "journal," The Oxfordian. Instead, they've
> chosen Dr. Michael Egan to do the job and take Stephanie Hughes' place
> (can anyone *really* replace Stephanie Hughes?).
>
> Egan, who I suppose would be termed a quasi-Oxfordian by Crowley, was
> lionized by Oxfordians on the Fellowship boards last year for his not-
> very-original theory that Thomas of Woodstock was written by
> Shakespeare. (Seehttp://www.shakespearefellowship.org/Reviews/jimenez.wood=
stock.htm).
> He is Scholar in Residence at Brigham Young University, Hawaii.
>
> Question: is this an upward academic move for someone from Brigham
> Young University? If Egan is *not* an Oxfordian, can they still claim
> to be a peer-reviewed journal?
>
> Enquiring minds want to know!
>
> TR

Wow, Tom, congratulations!
Starting a 65-post thread with no Neuendorffer!
Must be that he finds the title intimidating.
How did you do it?

I'm sure he'll be back for Dinah Shore's 23rd birthday Friday.

Greg Reynolds
(To answer your question, no, Oxfordians are not morons
but intelligent, misguided character assassins)