comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:43:55 +0100, ask@me.com (PeterBP) wrote:

>Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:39:38 -0500, Jim wrote:
>>
>> >In article <18dbu3dd3iua1ekittkgnfcer963e32b3a@4ax.com>,
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:31:42 -0500, Jim wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >From Information Week (That Mac-biased media for the Windiots. They
>> >> >re Mac-biased because they like Macs!)
>> >>
>> >> I can't wait for them to write an article that says Apple isn't
>> >> perfect. The Maccies will be wailing and gnashing ther teeth over
>> >> Information Week's anti-Mac bias. It'll be as hilarious as their
>> >> constant ping-ponging over other computer magazines.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >http://tinyurl.com/325q29
>> >> >
>> >> >"Mac Buyer's Guide: Which Apple Should You Pick?
>> >> >
>> >> >We've tested the Mac Pro, MacBook, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, the iMac,
>> >> >the Mac Mini, and the XServe. There's not a bad Apple among the bunch,
>> >> >and some are truly superb. We'll help you choose one that's right for
>> >> >you.
>> >> >
>> >> The one that is right for me is the one that gives me more power and
>> >> features for less than I can get in a PC. That means there isn't one
>> >> right now and the forseeable future doesn't look good either.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [Snip]
>> >
>> >Not that this was intended to bait you in any way, but your response is
>> >ever to totally predictable, just because it's Apple and for no other
>> >reason.
>>
>> As I've stated so many times in the past - Apple and its products
>> don't really mean anything to me. I'm not drawn here because I hate
>> Apple products. I'm drawn here by the hilarity provided by you guys -
>> Apple's users/worshippers.
>
>snip
>
>And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but
>considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

Wow. You guys really can't take any criticism, can you?



--

Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for president 2008.