Group: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: Sandman
Date: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: The Best Browser for Vista

In article ,
Snit wrote:

> "JCrowe" stated in post
> yIXGj.2885$p24.1955@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com on 3/27/08 6:19 PM:
>
> > Jesus wrote:
> >> True, users don't care about standards-compliance.
> >
> > Users MAY not care about standards compliance specifically, but
> > many users prefer the results of standards compliance in the writing
> > of web pages. The hacks necessary to support various IE versions and
> > quirks are well known and a real pain in the ass. But properly written,
> > standards compliant code has a way of failing less often and generally
> > performing better. I'm in the process of learning proper web programming
> > after years of idly hacking HTML....boy the crap I wrote back in the
> > period from the late 90s through the early 00s is downright
> > embarrassing. However the experience is really giving me an appreciation
> > of well designed web programming and especially websites that do the
> > right things for most computer browsers AND handhelds, print and
> > access for people with disabilities. Fascinating stuff really.
>
> Any sites of yours you can point to? I know I have talked to some other
> designers in CSMA who have been pretty poor at standards compliance - though
> they generally get better when told and shown how (there is a desire,
> clearly).

Snit once again show what a dishonorable person he is.




--
Sandman[.net]

Safety Articles | News in English | 20lbs in 30 days | Bluegrass | Usenet Newsfeeds