On Apr 9, 2:53=A0pm, Jim
> In article
> <4ed9bcd7-2101-4430-8be0-a809734df...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> =A0ed
> > Jim wrote:
> > > BBC News
>
> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7334123.stm
>
> > 'already' on the way out? =A0that 'timeline' puts the new version at
> > 2-3+ years after initial vista release... =A0you complain when you say
> > ms doesn't upgrade windows often enough, and you complain that it's
> > upgraded too often when it's still, what, about 1.5x longer than the
> > average os x release lasts?
>
> No ed, if you read one day BG says one timeline(next year) and the very
> next day M$ says something different as to when Windows 7 would be out,
> thus displacing Vista. Even though sooner can't happen fast enough for
> many who have Vista, or had as the case may be.
no jim, your post here and my reply were made before MS said something
different, so you can't use that as an excuse. good try at revising
the reasoning for your post though. :P