comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"The zara" stated in post
VZbLj.30279$dT.1549@bignews1.bellsouth.net on 4/9/08 4:06 PM:

>
> "Snit" wrote in message
> news:C422342B.B2BF1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
>> "The zara" stated in post
>> SH2Lj.30013$dT.14413@bignews1.bellsouth.net on 4/9/08 5:33 AM:
>>
>>>
>>> "Nashton" wrote in message news:fti871$smb$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:50:32 -0700, Snit
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have noticed that I have been debating about what is right or
>>>>>> wrong...
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> I have two questions (both in relation to posting in CSMA... I am not
>>>>>> asking
>>>>>> about actions outside of the group):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) What do you find to be unacceptable for yourself -
>>>>>
>>>>> Listening to you.
>>>>> *toilet flush*
>>>>> Snit circus sent where it belongs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But really, what a flaming moron this Snot.
>>>>
>>> Struck a nerve, eh?
>>>
>>>
>> Note where people will not answer the question. Too many of the trolls have
>> now put themselves in a position of supporting the idea of posting lies about
>> people in connection with their personal and business references so it will
>> be found in Google searches... and supporting all sorts of other things.
>>
>> All of this over Usenet debates. It is absolutely insane!
>>
> Truly unconscionable.

While no single test is a full "litmus test" of morality, how people "line
up" on this is a good indicator of their moral standing.

Those that claim it is perfectly fine to try to derogatorily tie someone's
personal and business life over a CSMA debate are, clearly, immoral. And
no, of course, that does not mean contacting someone's ISP or legal
authorities over such actions is immoral... as Carroll has tried to twist
that to mean in the past.



--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.