comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 31/3/08 12:34 AM, in article C4150F1C.B114E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com,
"Snit" wrote:

> "Sandman" stated in post
> mr-23C6D9.18214330032008@News.Individual.NET on 3/30/08 10:21 AM:
>
>> In article ,
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> Sandman is mad that I have completely, beyond any doubt, proved Wally to be
>>> wrong...
>>
>> Apart, from when you agreed that he was correct.
>
> When Wally correctly claimed that the number of items in S2 that were over
> 1000 was zero I agreed with him. When he made his ignorant claims that
> there was one number, zero, in the subset I *disagreed* with him.

"The "subset" mentioned above that you did not assign a label to which I
will merely call "the subset" came into being as a result of you wanting to
demonstrate how many elements of the set S2 were over 1000, the answer of
course was that none of the elements of S2 were over 1000"-Wally

"Right:"-Snit