comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article ,
Snit wrote:

> "Wally" stated in post
> C41F132F.1A785%Wally@wally.world.net on 4/6/08 8:54 AM:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/4/08 9:46 PM, in article C41E2231.B2577%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com,
> > "Snit" wrote:
> >
> >> "Wally" stated in post
> >> C41ED481.1A76E%Wally@wally.world.net on 4/6/08 4:27 AM:
> >>
> >>>> You repeatedly claimed that {0} was a subset.
> >>>
> >>> Correct!
> >>
> >> What did you think {0} was a subset of? The only set in question was
> >> "S2",
> >> a set of integers 1-10. As far as I can tell you mentioned no other set
> >> (other than the subset I am asking about, of course).
> >>
> >>> and in that I appear to have been incorrect!
> >>
> >> Appear? No - you *were* incorrect.
> >
> > It does appear that way!
>
> It "appears" that you were incorrect because you were... about *many* things
> in this discussion... as I have repeatedly detailed and you, at first,
> denied.
>
> >>> But I never said that "{0} was a subset of integers 1-10" so in that you
> >>> are
> >>> proven to be a liar!
> >>
> >> Ah, so you thought there was a subset of the set of... well... no set that
> >> we were talking about? What the...?
> >
> > Good to see that you no longer are trying to support your lie Snit!
>
> So the subset you were talking about was not a subset of anything...
>
> >> You simply had no clue what the heck you were talking about - you
> >> repeatedly
> >> showed your ignorance. Now you think I misinterpreted your ignorant
> >> claims.
> >> Whatever.
> >
> > No Snit ..not misinterpreted....you lied pure and simple!
> > I did not say ..."{0} was a subset of integers 1-10"!
>
> I underestimated your ignorance: I did not realize you could not figure out
> subsets were subsets of sets. I stand corrected: you were more ignorant
> than I believed you were.
>
> >>> Personally I will take being wrong over being a liar any day Snit!
> >>
> >> But you were both. Not only were you flat out wrong, Wally, you lied
> >> (such
> >> as when you repeatedly claimed I differentiated between zero and 0 even
> >> after I made it clear I had not).
> >
> > Just as you made it clear that I said "{0} was a subset of integers 1-10"
> > Snit? ROTFL!
> >
> > Most of what you claim to make clear Snit is as is the case here nothing
> > more than you lying!
>
> As I noted: I underestimated your ignorance. My mistake. I should have
> known better than to think you understood the meaning of the words you used:
> you did not even know what a subset is! If you have figured that out,
> finally, maybe next you can figure out what it means for one thing to be
> synonymous with another!

Snit, being a dishonorable man, replies with nothing but insults.


--
Sandman[.net]