comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Wally" stated in post
C41F132F.1A785%Wally@wally.world.net on 4/6/08 8:54 AM:

>
>
>
> On 6/4/08 9:46 PM, in article C41E2231.B2577%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com,
> "Snit" wrote:
>
>> "Wally" stated in post
>> C41ED481.1A76E%Wally@wally.world.net on 4/6/08 4:27 AM:
>>
>>>> You repeatedly claimed that {0} was a subset.
>>>
>>> Correct!
>>
>> What did you think {0} was a subset of? The only set in question was "S2",
>> a set of integers 1-10. As far as I can tell you mentioned no other set
>> (other than the subset I am asking about, of course).
>>
>>> and in that I appear to have been incorrect!
>>
>> Appear? No - you *were* incorrect.
>
> It does appear that way!

It "appears" that you were incorrect because you were... about *many* things
in this discussion... as I have repeatedly detailed and you, at first,
denied.

>>> But I never said that "{0} was a subset of integers 1-10" so in that you are
>>> proven to be a liar!
>>
>> Ah, so you thought there was a subset of the set of... well... no set that
>> we were talking about? What the...?
>
> Good to see that you no longer are trying to support your lie Snit!

So the subset you were talking about was not a subset of anything...

>> You simply had no clue what the heck you were talking about - you repeatedly
>> showed your ignorance. Now you think I misinterpreted your ignorant claims.
>> Whatever.
>
> No Snit ..not misinterpreted....you lied pure and simple!
> I did not say ..."{0} was a subset of integers 1-10"!

I underestimated your ignorance: I did not realize you could not figure out
subsets were subsets of sets. I stand corrected: you were more ignorant
than I believed you were.

>>> Personally I will take being wrong over being a liar any day Snit!
>>
>> But you were both. Not only were you flat out wrong, Wally, you lied (such
>> as when you repeatedly claimed I differentiated between zero and 0 even
>> after I made it clear I had not).
>
> Just as you made it clear that I said "{0} was a subset of integers 1-10"
> Snit? ROTFL!
>
> Most of what you claim to make clear Snit is as is the case here nothing
> more than you lying!

As I noted: I underestimated your ignorance. My mistake. I should have
known better than to think you understood the meaning of the words you used:
you did not even know what a subset is! If you have figured that out,
finally, maybe next you can figure out what it means for one thing to be
synonymous with another!


--
When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how
to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not
beautiful, I know it is wrong. -- R. Buckminster Fuller