comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"John" stated in post
HNWdnW7pWIsQZ2XanZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@netlojix.com on 4/6/08 9:29 AM:

>
> "Wally" wrote in message
> news:C41F132F.1A785%Wally@wally.world.net...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/08 9:46 PM, in article C41E2231.B2577%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com,
>> "Snit" wrote:
>>
>>> "Wally" stated in post
>>> C41ED481.1A76E%Wally@wally.world.net on 4/6/08 4:27 AM:
>>>
>>>>> You repeatedly claimed that {0} was a subset.
>>>>
>>>> Correct!
>>>
>>> What did you think {0} was a subset of? The only set in question was
>>> "S2",
>>> a set of integers 1-10. As far as I can tell you mentioned no other set
>>> (other than the subset I am asking about, of course).
>>>
>>>> and in that I appear to have been incorrect!
>>>
>>> Appear? No - you *were* incorrect.
>>
>> It does appear that way!
>>
>>>> But I never said that "{0} was a subset of integers 1-10" so in that you
>>>> are
>>>> proven to be a liar!
>>>
>>> Ah, so you thought there was a subset of the set of... well... no set
>>> that
>>> we were talking about? What the...?
>>
>> Good to see that you no longer are trying to support your lie Snit!
>>
>>> You simply had no clue what the heck you were talking about - you
>>> repeatedly
>>> showed your ignorance. Now you think I misinterpreted your ignorant
>>> claims.
>>> Whatever.
>>
>> No Snit ..not misinterpreted....you lied pure and simple!
>> I did not say ..."{0} was a subset of integers 1-10"!
>>
>>>> Personally I will take being wrong over being a liar any day Snit!
>>>
>>> But you were both. Not only were you flat out wrong, Wally, you lied
>>> (such
>>> as when you repeatedly claimed I differentiated between zero and 0 even
>>> after I made it clear I had not).
>>
>> Just as you made it clear that I said "{0} was a subset of integers 1-10"
>> Snit? ROTFL!
>>
>> Most of what you claim to make clear Snit is as is the case here nothing
>> more than you lying!
>>
>
>
> WRONG WALLY!!! It is a case of you as usual acting stupid.
>
I underestimated his ignorance... when he talked about a his subset of {0}
in relation to the set 0 integers 1-10 I thought he would at least know a
subset must be a subset of a set... but he did not even know that. Well,
that is his "out"... who cares: in the end it is clear that not only was he
amazingly ignorant of even very, very basic set theory but that he felt the
need to try to push his ignorant ideas on me - someone who clearly knew a
*lot* more of about the topic than he did. He also repeatedly lied about
me... though given how ignorant he clearly is I suppose there is a chance he
actually believed his lies at first.


--
Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.
--Albert Einstein