comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article ,
Snit wrote:

> "Steve Mackay" stated in post
> 47ec65fb$0$30599$4c368faf@roadrunner.com on 3/27/08 8:32 PM:
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> On Mar 27, 6:48 pm, "zara" wrote:
> >>> "Snit" wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> news:C411990F.B08C1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
> >>>
> >>>> "nospamatall" stated in post fshg2h$1o...@aioe.org
> >>>> on
> >>>> 3/27/08 6:02 PM:
> >>>>> zara wrote:
> >>>>>> Why don't you try trolling on your own dime with one of your
> >>>>>> sockpuppets?
> >>>>> ??
> >>>> According to Sandman if you have enough sock puppets call someone a liar
> >>>> they somehow become one.
> >>> It's amazing how few "real" people are on this group. It's about 80%
> >>> sockpuppets. I only use a sock puppet once or twice to get past the KF.
> >>> And
> >>> I have done that at least on a dozen occasions. I don't have another
> >>> identity that I use regularly. I like using the name "zara",---- maccies
> >>> hate it.
> >>
> >> Long ago I used the name "Brock McNuggets" as a joke. I was also told
> >> by some of the trolls that if I admitted to using another name they
> >> would stop trolling me - so I used that name and then admitted to it.
> >> They, of course, lied and then whined for *years* about my using the
> >> name they asked me to.
> >>
> >> Only in CSMA... some people are just whacked!
> >
> > Ummm, okay sigmond.
>
> LOL! Thanks for making my point.

Your "point" can only be how you were busted early on...

Elizabot:
Shut up, Snit. You're not fooling anybody.

"Sigmond's" NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.117.214.4

Snit's NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.117.214.4 (from a different nesgroup):

From: Snit
Approved: ASAPM Robomoderator
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.117.214.4

Perhaps your are actually Snit's significant other. Whatever you are,
you are a pathetic sockpuppet.

Snit:
"I have no idea who Sigmond is. Maybe someone who snuck into
my house".

--

Steve Mackay's "Snit's "sockpuppet" exposed" thread:

--

Sandman's "The Official Sigmond FAQ" thread:

--

Additional sigmond data collected by Elizabot:
[excerpt]
4/2 Mackay posts "Snit's 'Sockpuppet' exposed," showing Snit's address
as 24.117.214.36.
Suddenly, a half hour later, sigmond's posting address changes (sure
sign of guilt)...
<40a79db4$0$200$75868355@news.frii.net>
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Snit... on the sex webpage he created while using the sigmond handle:
"Since you ask: I find it barely amusing but poorly worded,
inappropriate, and in poor taste.

While I do not condone such comments, I can understand why such a post
would be directed toward the target that it was. "

A few replies over the Elizabot/sigmond incident:
Alan Baker:
"Cut the bullshit. It was you".

Edwin:
"Did you think your post was amusing, Snit/Sigmond? How sad for you..."

Bill Riel:
"Agreed - I don't know if Snit/Sigmond are the same person or not, but
that posting is the lowest thing I've seen on CSMA and that IS saying
something. I'm really disgusted.

Even with all the idiots posting here I've never felt the need for a
killfile until now..."

Snit replied to Bill Riel with:
"We are not the same person, and I will agree with you that the posting
was in very poor taste and was not something I condone or find
appropriate".

--
Strange lie told by Snit as he tries to distance himself from the
reality he created with his 'sigmond' sockpuppet he got busted with:
"You even sink to trying to use clear sarcasm of mine against me, when I
stated, *sarcastically* that someone must have broken into my house when
Steve first started playing his games".

Obviously, someone needs to look up the word "sarcasm", sigmond.

--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit