comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article
,
Tim Adams wrote:

> In article ,
> Snit wrote:
>
> > "Tim Adams" stated in post
> > teadams$2$0$0$3-0CF378.15254530032008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
> > 3/30/08 12:25 PM:
> >
> > > In article ,
> > > Snit wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Tim Adams" stated in post
> > >> teadams$2$0$0$3-5A3CBC.08421730032008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
> > >> 3/30/08 5:42 AM:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>>> ... snit, running from offering any support for his claims is
> > >>>>> noted. Did you forget all the lies you wrote michael? Here they are
> > >>>>> again,
> > >>>>> since
> > >>>>> you felt the need earlier to snip them out of your reply.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Lie #1 "Long ago I used the name "Brock McNuggets" as a joke."
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Where is the lie?
> > >>>
> > >>> You didn't do it as a 'joke'. You were using the sock puppet to troll
> > >>> with
> > >>> and
> > >>> were caught at it.
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Lie #2 "I was also told by some of the trolls that if I admitted to
> > >>>>> using
> > >>>>> another name they would stop trolling me - so I used that name and
> > >>>>> then
> > >>>>> admitted
> > >>>>> to it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Again, where is the lie?
> > >>>
> > >>> Don't see the contradiction with your first claim? Of course, the full
> > >>> statement
> > >>> is a lie in that nobody told you that if you admitted to using another
> > >>> name
> > >>> that
> > >>> they would then stop trolling you. Since you are the troll, such a
> > >>> statement
> > >>> by
> > >>> you is a TOTLAL LIE.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Please note how they even contradict each other.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Lie #3 "They, of course, lied and then whined for *years* about my
> > >>>>> using
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> name they asked me to."
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you think those comments of mine are dishonest then *support* your
> > >>>> claim...
> > >>>
> > >>> The story is YOUR claim. It is a total LIE. You posted it, now support
> > >>> it
> > >>> if
> > >>> you
> > >>> really think you can. I know you can't, and from your total lack of
> > >>> trying,
> > >>> it
> > >>> is clear that even you know you can't.
> > >>>
> > >>> You even made up a story in another thread about having 'offered help
> > >>> to
> > >>> people
> > >>> with their web design'. That was proven a total lie way back when you
> > >>> first
> > >>> posted it. You couldn't support it then, you can't support it now, yet
> > >>> you
> > >>> continue to post your lie and try to make people believe it.
> > >>>
> > >>>> do not merely repeat it as you try to tie words related to my
> > >>>> business name and real name to your trolling.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> You are
> > >
> > > running away from supporting your lies once again snit. No wonder you
> > > call
> > > your
> > > company the prescott computer idiot. you fit the bill perfectly.
> > >
> > > michael glasser posted the lies but can't support any of them. so
> > > typical.
> > >
> > > keep running michael.
> >
> > Reported to abuse@supernews.com
>
> Poor michael, posts his lies, gets called on them and rather than either
> correct
> his claims OR even try to support them (something even he knows he can't do),
> he
> runs away from reality. is it any wonder that you are referred to as 'lying
> piece of elephant dung" run michael run

Here is concrete proof that Snit used the Brock McNuggets sock puppet in
another newsgroup (before csma)... a poster wrote this after outing Snit
due to Snit's carelessness:

"Good grief, Snit - I would never have thought Brock McNuggets was YOU".


Snit's reply tried to pretend he'd made some sort of honest 'mistake'
(as if one could do that with sock puppets), but it's followed by an
easily proven lie. Snit writes:

"Oops.  I am just setting up my new computer and I forgot to change the
name back to snit before posting.  But, yes, Brock McNuggets is another
name I sometimes use.  I just find it funny".


If you do a google search for Brock McNuggets before the date of this
'Brock McNuggets post' he is being confronted with you won't a single
"posting" event using that name, not "sometimes", as Snit is shown
claiming here, or any other time. Obviously, Snit was preparing to troll
in a newsgroup devoted to people prone to anxiety with a brand new sock
puppet... got busted immediately... and then proceeded to lie about it.

(cue up Snit's BS machine... we can probably expect some outrageous
story that will attempt to stretch reality far beyond belief)

--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit