comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article ,
Snit wrote:

> "Tim Adams" stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-CB1513.23194529032008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
> 3/29/08 8:19 PM:
>
> > In article ,
> > Snit wrote:
> >
> >> "Tim Adams" stated in post
> >> teadams$2$0$0$3-27873F.16455229032008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
> >> 3/29/08 1:45 PM:
> >>
> >>> In article ,
> >>> Snit wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Tim Adams" stated in post
> >>>> teadams$2$0$0$3-444C80.13205629032008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
> >>>> 3/29/08 10:20 AM:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Steve, what I found funny with snit's comments above were the obvious
> >>>>> lies
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> contained.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He was outed as using a sock puppet named "Brock McNuggets" just
> >>>>> like
> >>>>> he
> >>>>> was
> >>>>> outed with his using sigmond and others.
> >>>>> he's also delusional claiming that people told him that if he
> >>>>> admitted
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> using another name, they would stop trolling him.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it any wonder then that people tell him that he's "a lying piece of
> >>>>> elephant dung that uses sockpuppets?"
> >>>>
> >>>> If you think I have lied then try to support your accusation.
> >>>
> >>> Why not support you *claim*? You made it, but then you can't support it
> >>> as
> >>> we
> >>> all know it is another of your LIES.
> >>>
> >>> All the more reason people tell you that you're a lying piece of elephant
> >>> dung
> >>
> >> Your lack of support for your accusation is noted... and was completely
> >> predictable.
> >
> > ... snit, running from offering any support for his claims is
> > noted. Did you forget all the lies you wrote michael? Here they are again,
> > since
> > you felt the need earlier to snip them out of your reply.
> >
> > Lie #1 "Long ago I used the name "Brock McNuggets" as a joke."
>
> Where is the lie?

You didn't do it as a 'joke'. You were using the sock puppet to troll with and
were caught at it.

>
> > Lie #2 "I was also told by some of the trolls that if I admitted to using
> > another name they would stop trolling me - so I used that name and then
> > admitted
> > to it.
>
> Again, where is the lie?

Don't see the contradiction with your first claim? Of course, the full statement
is a lie in that nobody told you that if you admitted to using another name that
they would then stop trolling you. Since you are the troll, such a statement by
you is a TOTLAL LIE.


>
> > Please note how they even contradict each other.
> >
> > Lie #3 "They, of course, lied and then whined for *years* about my using
> > the
> > name they asked me to."
>
> If you think those comments of mine are dishonest then *support* your
> claim...

The story is YOUR claim. It is a total LIE. You posted it, now support it if you
really think you can. I know you can't, and from your total lack of trying, it
is clear that even you know you can't.

You even made up a story in another thread about having 'offered help to people
with their web design'. That was proven a total lie way back when you first
posted it. You couldn't support it then, you can't support it now, yet you
continue to post your lie and try to make people believe it.

> do not merely repeat it as you try to tie words related to my
> business name and real name to your trolling.

So your company is now known as the 'prescott computer idiot'? You might want to
change that name, as most intelligent people won't do business with somebody who
admits to being an idiot.

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm