comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article ,
Steve de Mena wrote:

> Maverick wrote:
> > Alan Baker wrote:
> >
> >> In article ,
> >> Steve de Mena wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Lewis wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In message Steve
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Lewis wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In message Steve
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Come on, what new Leopard features do people really use? I don't
> >>>>>>> use Spaces or Time Machine, and I bet many here don't either.
> >>>>>>> Leopard has been a lot more UNstable for me than Tiger.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've not had a single crash of Leopard that was not caused by
> >>>>>> fiddly RAM
> >>>>>> modules. Not one.
> >>>>
> >>>>> I imagine you don't have a Mac Pro with an ATI x1900XT card.
> >>>>
> >>>> The X1900XT has always been a piece of crap. Has nothing to do with
> >>>> Mac OS.
> >>>
> >>> The daily kernel panics I was getting in Leopard, which I never got
> >>> in Tiger, due to this card, have "nothing to do with the OS"?
> >>>
> >>> Could you say that again?
> >>>
> >>> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> Bad hardware is one of the things from which an OS cannot protect you.
> >>
> >
> > Maybe he should go check out ATIs site for a download of a new driver.
> > But I only saw his spot thru you.
> > :D
>
> The problems started for everyone with Leopard. 1,000 plus posts in
> multiple threads on the Apple Mac Pro discussion site. This "bad
> hardware" never gave anyone a problem in Tiger.
>
> Steve

Hmmmm...

Perhaps Leopard drives the graphics card harder....

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."