comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article ,
Snit wrote:

> "Sandman" stated in post
> mr-71C7D1.22070927032008@News.Individual.NET on 3/27/08 2:07 PM:
>
> > In article ,
> > Snit wrote:
> >
> >> "Sandman" stated in post
> >> mr-2281EE.18113827032008@News.Individual.NET on 3/27/08 10:11 AM:
> >>
> >>> In article ,
> >>> Snit wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Sandman" stated in post
> >>>> mr-582478.08165027032008@News.Individual.NET on 3/27/08 12:16 AM:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article ,
> >>>>> Snit wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Whose email address is that? What do you mean by doing an email
> >>>>>>>>> address?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My guess: Sandman is showing he cannot let go of past accusations,
> >>>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>>> though he publicly agreed to let the past go.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What past accusation are you in reference to when "guessing"? Or are
> >>>>>>> you just making dishonest accusations again? Figures.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sandman, seriously, for a while you were acting in a mostly honest and
> >>>>>> honorable way
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As opposed to you, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Still no references to these supposed past accusations, Michael? Why
> >>>>> are you lying so much?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I snipped content of this post as per Snits statement that
> >>>>> he does not require one to respond to every point in a post:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "I have *never* said one is obligated to respond to every point in
> >>>>> a post or every question."
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You quoted an example of your lie, Sandman. Why?
> >>>
> >>> Still no references to these supposed past accusations, Michael? Why
> >>> are you lying so much?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Unsubstantiated accusation.
> >>>
> >> You used a quote of mine to try to defend your dishonest snipping,
> >> Sandman.
> >
> > Unsubstantiated accusation.
> >
> >
> BS: you quoted it above.
>
> Come on, Sandman, stop lying.

Unsubstantiated accusation.


--
Sandman[.net]