comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Tim Adams" stated in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-05638D.06222002042008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
4/2/08 3:22 AM:

> In article ,
> Snit wrote:
>
>> "Tim Adams" stated in post
>> teadams$2$0$0$3-A3FB86.06433201042008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net on
>> 4/1/08 3:43 AM:
>>
>>> aks anit, can't read, he wanders off topic yet again.
>>
>> Are you still claiming that any sex you have had has all the "features" of
>> incest? Just curious.
>
> Since I've never claimed that, why would you want to know?

Differing views on sex and incest:
Snit: sex should not have the "feature" of being incestuous
Tim Adams: sex MUST include all of the features of incest

You even claimed that your view was true based on the "definition" of sex
you believe in. Your define sex in a perverted way if, for you, it *must*
have all the "features" of incest.

> It is true however that all the elements of the subset incest are contained in
> set sex. Something you can't seem to comprehend.

What makes you think I share Wally's ignorance about subsets? He, not I, is
the one who has insisted such things as {0} being a subset of integers 1
through 10.

--
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments
that take our breath away.