In article
Snit
> "Sandman"
> mr-8093C3.12512903042008@News.Individual.NET on 4/3/08 4:51 AM:
>
> > In article
> > Snit
> >
> >> "Sandman"
> >> mr-1C7578.00531303042008@News.Individual.NET on 4/2/08 4:53 PM:
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> Mayor of R'lyeh
> >>>
> >>>>> Now, a few
> >>>>> years later, at least in the US consumer market Apple has grown to above
> >>>>> 20%... if you buy the current stats floating around.
> >>>>
> >>>> Meanwhile, back in the real world where numbers aren't cherry picked
> >>>> to inflate marketshare, Apple is still hovering between 2 and 3%.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, it's closer to 80%
> >>>
> >> And Sandman heads off into la la land again.
> >
> > And Michael dishonestly snips away what clearly marked my remark as a
> > joke, pretending that it wasn't there and replied as if I hadn't
> > included it; i.e. lying.
>
> -----
> In article
> Mayor of R'lyeh
>
> > > Now, a few
> > >years later, at least in the US consumer market Apple has grown to above
> > >20%... if you buy the current stats floating around.
> >
> > Meanwhile, back in the real world where numbers aren't cherry picked
> > to inflate marketshare, Apple is still hovering between 2 and 3%.
>
> Actually, it's closer to 80%
> -----
>
> Your claim that Apple's share is "closer to 80%" is absurd.
> Your claim that I snipped is a lie.
Incorrect:
-----
In article
Mayor of R'lyeh
> > Now, a few
> >years later, at least in the US consumer market Apple has grown to above
> >20%... if you buy the current stats floating around.
>
> Meanwhile, back in the real world where numbers aren't cherry picked
> to inflate marketshare, Apple is still hovering between 2 and 3%.
Actually, it's closer to 80%
--
Sandman[.net], who can also make claims without a reference.
-----
Michael, a liar still. Will he admit to his mistake and apologize? Of
course not!
--
Sandman[.net]