comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article ,
Snit wrote:

> "Sandman" stated in post
> mr-898B5C.18532308042008@News.Individual.NET on 4/8/08 9:53 AM:
>
> > In article ,
> > Snit wrote:
> >
> >>>>> As usual, Snit shows he has an agenda and has no problem by dragging
> >>>>> up past issues in a dishonorable way.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the most recent exchange I have had with Steve Mackay...
> >>>
> >>> Irrelevant, it is more than four months old and you drag it up since
> >>> you have an agenda.
> >>
> >> Wait: Mackay brought up accusations he made *years* ago... but being that
> >> fact does not fit your agenda you ignore it.
> >
> > He doesn't go around claiming to be honorable
>
> LOL! Ah, so you are OK with him not be.
>
> Wow, Sandman, you are really a silly little troll... just amazing.
>
>
> > , making a thing about it, nor has he signed an agreement that would prevent
> > him from doing that.
>
> Wait: you claimed the agreement was no longer in effect. Oh, that is only
> for you - you want out of it... but you want to hold me to your view of it.
> Poor little Sandman... so cowed... and so dishonest you have to snip most of
> every post of mine you respond to.
>
> > I am pointing out the *irony* of you trying to claim that you are
> > *honorable* while clearly having an agenda towards people.
>
> So you have no problem with Mackay bringing up unsupported accusations of
> his from *years* ago but you freak out over my talking about the likely
> reason he is doing so now.
>
> You are so darn funny!

Reposting your trolling only highlights it, Michael Glasser.


--
Sandman[.net]