comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Sandman" stated in post
mr-D2F0D7.21534908042008@News.Individual.NET on 4/8/08 12:53 PM:

>>>>>> I do not believe you have admitted to that before. Good for you. And
>>>>>> yet you repeatedly spew accusations against me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Using sock puppets
>>>>>>
>>>>> Huh? That's not an accusations, it's a fact. It has been proven. The proof
>>>>> is yet to be countered in any way.
>>>>>
>>>> Wait: the last time anyone even pretended to be able to support that
>>>> accusation was, literally, years ago. Years.
>>>>
>>>> And yet you posted, just minutes ago:
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant, it is more than four months old and you
>>>> drag it up since you have an agenda.
>>>>
>>>> So now you make it clear you think to even bring up such accusations is to
>>>> show one has an "agenda"... and not just an agenda of truth and honor
>>>> (based on your context).
>>>>
>>>> And then you completely snip references to Mackay's other accusations, the
>>>> most extreme is his outright lie of my posting people's addresses (in
>>>> context physical, not IP). Where is your statement condemning that? You
>>>> jumped into this to push your agenda, Sandman.
>>>>
>>>> Do you see now how easy it is to show you are cowed.
>>>>
>>> And yet here you are, claiming - years after - that it is merely an
>>> accusation instead of the fact that it is. You are still trying to lie and
>>> obfuscate about an old issue, proving once again what a dishonorable person
>>> you are.
>>>
>> I returned the comments you ran from: namely your clear agenda, your double
>> standards, and the facts that show how cowed you are.
>>
>> Instead of even talking about that you tried to focus on accusations made
>> from *years* ago. Years. After you just whined about my talking about
>> things from four months ago - and doing so with a clear reason (to show the
>> most likely reason why Mackay was lashing out now). In the end Mackay
>> finally admitted I was right in that I had proved him wrong and has pulled
>> way back from his trolling since then. He will not, of course, support his
>> silly accusations, but so be it... that is just par for course with him.
>
> No, you dishonestly edited the quoted text in your followup to contain
> text that wasn't in my post.

Poor Sandman... can't deal with people pointing out his dishonest snipping.

You also left the topic of your hypocrisy and your being cowed behind. What
a shock! You run from your actions and whine when your dishonest acts are
pointed out.

Come on, Sandman,is it really that painful for you to talk about your open
hypocrisy of whining about me bringing up things from four months ago in
*response* to Mackay bringing up accusations against me from *yours* ago?
You know, Sandman, just one of the many dishonest acts you are committing
and running from.

In any case, Mackay also made accusations against me of posting people's
addresses... an accusation I do not believe he even pretended to support
even years ago... and yet you ignore that as well.

You are such a cowed hypocrite. Amazing... really.


--
When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how
to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not
beautiful, I know it is wrong. -- R. Buckminster Fuller