comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Sandman" stated in post
mr-898B5C.18532308042008@News.Individual.NET on 4/8/08 9:53 AM:

> In article ,
> Snit wrote:
>
>>>>> As usual, Snit shows he has an agenda and has no problem by dragging
>>>>> up past issues in a dishonorable way.
>>>>
>>>> This is the most recent exchange I have had with Steve Mackay...
>>>
>>> Irrelevant, it is more than four months old and you drag it up since
>>> you have an agenda.
>>
>> Wait: Mackay brought up accusations he made *years* ago... but being that
>> fact does not fit your agenda you ignore it.
>
> He doesn't go around claiming to be honorable

LOL! Ah, so you are OK with him not be.

Wow, Sandman, you are really a silly little troll... just amazing.


> , making a thing about it, nor has he signed an agreement that would prevent
> him from doing that.

Wait: you claimed the agreement was no longer in effect. Oh, that is only
for you - you want out of it... but you want to hold me to your view of it.
Poor little Sandman... so cowed... and so dishonest you have to snip most of
every post of mine you respond to.

> I am pointing out the *irony* of you trying to claim that you are
> *honorable* while clearly having an agenda towards people.

So you have no problem with Mackay bringing up unsupported accusations of
his from *years* ago but you freak out over my talking about the likely
reason he is doing so now.

You are so darn funny!


--
Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!