comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
news:alangbaker-FBEF0F.08453813042008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
> In article ,
> "Hasta La Vista" wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" wrote in message
>> news:alangbaker-2F9F87.12101012042008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
>> > In article ,
>> > "Hasta La Vista" wrote:
>> >
>> >> "George Graves" wrote in message
>> >> news:0001HW.C424FD760008850AF01846D8@news.comcast.net...
>> >> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:06:46 -0700, Hasta La Vista wrote
>> >> > (in article ):
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "George Graves" wrote in message
>> >> >> news:0001HW.C4241D180023096EF01846D8@news.comcast.net...
>> >> >>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:24:53 -0700, Hasta La Vista wrote
>> >> >>> (in article ):
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> "Snit" wrote in message
>> >> >>>> news:C424182B.B2F3D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
>> >> >>>>> "Hasta La Vista" stated in post
>> >> >>>>> 1_-dnTrNO86QVGPanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@comcast.com on 4/10/08 7:12 PM:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> "Snit" wrote in message
>> >> >>>>>> news:C419A678.B1E76%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
>> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> t-n
>> >> >>>>>>> ow
>> >> >>>>>>> -1
>> >> >>>>>>> -m
>> >> >>>>>>> usic-retailer-in-us.html>
>> >> >>>>>>> -----
>> >> >>>>>>> Over the past few years, we have watched Apple climb the
>> >> >>>>>>> music sales chart courtesy of the iTunes. Last month we
>> >> >>>>>>> learned that Apple passed Best Buy to become the number two
>> >> >>>>>>> retailer in the the US. Now, Apple has ascended to the top of
>> >> >>>>>>> the charts, surpassing Wal-Mart for the first time ever,
>> >> >>>>>>> according to the NPD MusicWatch Survey.
>> >> >>>>>>> -----
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Congrats to Apple
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Wow. Apple does better than Wal-Mart? Family Dollar must be
>> >> >>>>>> shaking
>> >> >>>>>> in
>> >> >>>>>> their boots. Who's next on the Apple hit list? The
>> >> >>>>>> Goodwill
>> >> >>>>>> Thrift
>> >> >>>>>> Store?
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Did you even understand the comments you read?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Of course.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Your reply indicates you likely did not.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> No it doesn't.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Next time you don't want a discussion don't bother to reply.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I hope that you don't think that you actually discuss anything
>> >> >>> here?
>> >> >>> All
>> >> >>> you
>> >> >>> do is troll and denigrate. You don't deserve any better than the
>> >> >>> above
>> >> >>> response!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You must have run out of your meds again.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Is that the cleverest rejoinder that you can come up with? Hell,
>> >> > even
>> >> > zara-the-zero or his alter-ego Pratt do better than that.
>> >>
>> >> I offered no rejoinder. To do so would be accepting your rant as an
>> >> attempt at communication.
>> >
>> > Is English your first language,
>>
>> Yes. Is it yours?

Mr. Now Answer The Question skips answering yet another question.

>> > "rejoinder |ri?joind?r|
>> > noun
>> > a reply, esp. a sharp or witty one : she would have made some cutting
>> > rejoinder but none came to mind."
>> >
>> > Now, please note that it doesn't have to be sharp or witty, so it still
>> > applies.
>>
>> It has to be a reply. I didn't reply to anything George wrote, so it
>> does
>> not apply.
>
> You did reply. You said "You must have run out of your meds again."

That was not a reply to anything George said.

>>
>> Yet another ridiculous argument about nothing from you, made worse by
>> your
>> failure to understand the defintion you supplied yourself!
>
> LOL

You're laughing again? WTF is wrong with you?

>>
>> Now take your meds.
>
> Another weak rejoinder from Edwin.

Where?

Why won't you take your meds?