comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Daniel Johnson wrote:
> "Snit" wrote in message
> news:C41AD185.B20FE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
>
>> "Daniel Johnson" stated in post
>> RIednXs6xM_b62janZ2dnUVZ_hisnZ2d@supernews.com on 4/3/08 5:28 PM:
>>
>>>> No, it is illustrative of how PS on Mac will be behind in one way
>>>> for one
>>>> version of the software.
>>>
>>>
>>> That too.
>>>
>>> But it's not like this is an isolated thing. Maya is the same way, as I
>>> recall.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, but is Apache 64 bit on Windows? :)
>
>
> Seemingly. At least the first hit when I googled "64-bit Apache" offered
> 64-bit Apache binaries.
>
> Of course, who would want to run Apache on Windows? You get (64-bit) IIS
> on Windows! :D
>

Simple: Apache doesn't cost you an arm and a leg to run.

> [snip]
>
>>>> According to Activity Monitor httpd is 64 bit - not that for my
>>>> usage it
>>>> really matters.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, c'mon, Apache isn't a Real OS X app. It's all Linuxy and stuff!
>>
>>
>> One click to rule them all... um... to turn it on.
>
>
> You see? It's evil. Just like the Dark Lord Sauron.
>
> If you keep using it, it will turn your iBook black! :D

But preserves your wallet. :-))