alt.politics.bush

stuff_stuff@comcast.net wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:28:36 -0600, David Hartung
> wrote:
>
>> stuff_stuff@comcast.net wrote:
>>> On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:40:02 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Hartung wrote in
>>>> news:PYOdnRt3noDJFTPanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>>>
>>>>> stuff_stuff@comcast.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> While you're at it, what do YOU think did all that killing and dying
>>>>>> accomplished?
>>>>> In the end, nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am an eternal optimist, I believe that had the war been prosecuted
>>>>> properly, and had the military been given the task of winning, the war
>>>>> would have been over well before 1968, and today, Vietnam would not be a
>>>>> communist country.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact remains that Johnson had no intention of ever winning the war,
>>>>> and by the time Nixon was elected, the American people would have
>>>>> refused to support he sort of all out action a victory would have required.
>>>>>
>>>> It was Johnson's fault that Nixon campaigned on a
>>>> plank to end the war and withdraw troop from Vietnam?
>> What does this have to do with the simple fact that Johnson never
>> intended to allow our troops to win the war?
>
>
> What a stupid and ignorant thing to say. It's totally unworthy of a
> response.

However, it is true.