alt.sci.physics.new-theories

"Grant M. W." wrote in message
news:uJHrj.12441$FA.11124@pd7urf2no...
> "Laurent" wrote in message
> news:395b2d45-fe6f-4590-855b-1091665c1108@t47g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Nov 28, 9:31 am, dlzc wrote:
>>> Dear Laurent:
>>>
>>> On Nov 28, 7:00 am, Laurent wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Excellent synopsis up to this point. The "pantheism" bit was a little
>>> odd...
>>>
>>> > CBR (Cosmic Background Radiation) is material, and
>>> > Einstein's aether is physical but immaterial. First there
>>> > needs to be an aether before we can have anything like
>>> > matter, fields, spacetime, or even Wheeler's quantum
>>> > foam.
>>>
>>> Doesn't follow. Energy excites "separateness", powers "material
>>> properties" (witness Bose-Einstein condensates). But since no space
>>> is empty of all the matter in the Universe (witness self-
>>> interference), no aether separate from the Universe is required. I
>>> just wish you would preface your personal comments with some
>>> indication that you are no longer simply relating facts-in-evidence.
>>>
>>> David A. Smith
>>
>> I never said the aether is separated from the universe. I said the
>> aether is what unifies the uni-verse. The aether is one, therefore the
>> universe is one. The aether is energy, it is where the universe
>> emerged from. The aether is the substrate. But it isn't matter, nor is
>> it space as conceived in the GTR, yet, it is where properties like the
>> speed of propagation and direction of fields are determined.
>>
>> --
>> Laurent
>
>
>
>
>
> Isn't the time - space fabric another name for the aether? Instead of
> gravity wells does it make sense to call those 'wells' compressed aether
> or compressed time - space fabric instead? Please feel free to correct me
> if I'm out of line.
>
>
>
> Grant


Also would like to suggest that different densities of aether affect light
and any vibrating particle as if it is going through a optical lens when
going from one aether density to another thus not only time space is more
condensed in terms of length of travel that particles must travel but also
a shorter length that light must travel, and also light and matter are
refracted by the difference in densities..much like going through an optical
lens from the density of air to the density of glass.


Grant


I would like to add that C is not a constant but a misconception, the
result of a shrinking measuring stick because of the relative speed it (the
measuring stick) is travelling in terms of passing light. Therefore the
disproof of aether by light velocity in relation to the velocity of the
earth is a flaw. the measuring stick is compressed in the line of motion
and stretched in the line of its reverse motion just as the light that is
observe red and measured by it. therefore C equals the measuring stick?
The stick is pressed from the forward motion of the earth and stretched from
its back side. The trip home is always shorter than the journey away?
Could it be that the beam of light was in the same density of aether leaving
the measuring stick as when it returned to the measuring stick as aether is
like currents in an electrical wire that has the same resistance in both
directions. That aether has a constant resistance in any direction and
varies in density only under the changing influence of gravity. Some places
time - space fabric is more compressed than others? The light gets a boost
from the earths motion on the aether on its way out and a boost from the
earth motion on its way back! Like electrical conduction where the wire is
being move forward not into by the motion of an object pushing it. It
appears that the only thing that compresses aether is gravity. Otherwise
moving objects including light are compressed by velocity pushing against
the aether. Anyway, does anyone know how to open a newsgroup for wormhole
discussions?




More data?





Grant



feedback? more data (short circuit)