alt.social-security-disability

On Feb 12, 3:10=EF=BF=BDpm, Coleah wrote:
> On Feb 12, 1:14=EF=BF=BDpm, "Jim" wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Coleah" wrote in message
>
> >news:960649c3-a691-462c-baf8-0c1262226a50@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...=

>
> > > On Feb 11, 9:15 pm, "Jim" wrote:
> > >> "Six String Stu" wrote in
> > >> messagenews:86de2$47b10ced$d893ae87$9888@ispn.net...
>
> > >> > "Jim" wrote in message
> > >> >> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDWe deport people every single day. The ICE has =
a policy of SIX
> > >> >> arrests
> > >> >> being allowed before they "get tough" and actually prosecute and
> > >> >> deport.
> > >> >> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDIt's a start.....
>
> > >> > It's not a start, it's a damn shame.
>
> > >> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD What I want is a list of all the federa=
l laws =3DI=3D can break six
> > >> times
> > >> before they do a damned thing about it!!!!
> > >> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD This is FUBAR!!!!!
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > > I believe your idea has value.
> > > Absolutely a list needs to be compiled and published so the different
> > > government agency's (federal, state and local) can get horribly
> > > embarrassed about their blind-sided part which is contributing to the
> > > overall 'fiasco'.
>
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD Well, I do know that in =3DMissouri=3D a woman can h=
it her disabled husband
> > hard enough that he has to go to the emergency room for x-rays; and the
> > woman at the prosecutor's office agrees with these statements:
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD 1. If he had hit her, he would go to jail.
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD 2. If he had hit her =3Dback=3D, he would go to jail=
.
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD 3. Since it's a woman doing the 3rd degree assault, =
it will not be
> > prosecuted.
> > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD Needless to say, I'm not real happy about this. I ha=
ve been in
> > excruciating pain and wearing a brace for over a month....
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I'll add this issue to my list, Jim.
>
> Have you consulted an attorney?
> This makes no sense, and sounds like the prosecutor was snowing you
> (probably so she wouldn't have to file a case, and thereby save the
> tax payers money).
>
> The wording of the statutes here:http://www.showme.net/~capegadm/pa/INETDO=
MESTICVIO%20NEWCRIMES.htm
> certainly does not specifiy the gender of the assaulter.
>
> http://www.showme.net/~capegadm/pa/INETDOMESTICVIO%20ARREST.htm
>
> I see that some of the Domestic Violence Centers in Missouri whose
> webpages I pulled up do not use the term 'battered woman's shelter'
> anymore. =EF=BF=BDNow it's just 'family violence'.
>
> Several years ago there was a men's group who protested that there was
> no 'battered men's shelters' and talked about filing a lawsuit.
>
> I would really push the matter, Jim. =EF=BF=BDI wonder if a civil suit for=

> damages, pain and suffering could be filed. =EF=BF=BDHave you gotten a
> restraining order? =EF=BF=BDNo one should get away with assaulting another=
.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Jim, here is th elaw in Illinois. I will bet anything, MO. has the
same type of law. Youn eed to google MO. state statutes.

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=3D2100&ChapAct=3D750%26=
nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B60%2F&ChapterID=3D59&ChapterName=3DFAMILIES&ActName=3DI=
llinois+Domestic+Violence+Act+of+1986%2E