Group: alt.social-security-disability
From: Coleah
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Here's a take on the immigration issue.

On Feb 12, 1:14=A0pm, "Jim" wrote:
> "Coleah" wrote in message
>
> news:960649c3-a691-462c-baf8-0c1262226a50@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 11, 9:15 pm, "Jim" wrote:
> >> "Six String Stu" wrote in
> >> messagenews:86de2$47b10ced$d893ae87$9888@ispn.net...
>
> >> > "Jim" wrote in message
> >> >> =A0 =A0We deport people every single day. The ICE has a policy of SI=
X
> >> >> arrests
> >> >> being allowed before they "get tough" and actually prosecute and
> >> >> deport.
> >> >> =A0 =A0It's a start.....
>
> >> > It's not a start, it's a damn shame.
>
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 What I want is a list of all the federal laws =3DI=3D can b=
reak six
> >> times
> >> before they do a damned thing about it!!!!
> >> =A0 =A0 This is FUBAR!!!!!
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > I believe your idea has value.
> > Absolutely a list needs to be compiled and published so the different
> > government agency's (federal, state and local) can get horribly
> > embarrassed about their blind-sided part which is contributing to the
> > overall 'fiasco'.
>
> =A0 =A0 Well, I do know that in =3DMissouri=3D a woman can hit her disable=
d husband
> hard enough that he has to go to the emergency room for x-rays; and the
> woman at the prosecutor's office agrees with these statements:
> =A0 =A0 1. If he had hit her, he would go to jail.
> =A0 =A0 2. If he had hit her =3Dback=3D, he would go to jail.
> =A0 =A0 3. Since it's a woman doing the 3rd degree assault, it will not be=

> prosecuted.
> =A0 =A0 Needless to say, I'm not real happy about this. I have been in
> excruciating pain and wearing a brace for over a month....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'll add this issue to my list, Jim.

Have you consulted an attorney?
This makes no sense, and sounds like the prosecutor was snowing you
(probably so she wouldn't have to file a case, and thereby save the
tax payers money).

The wording of the statutes here: http://www.showme.net/~capegadm/pa/INETDOM=
ESTICVIO%20NEWCRIMES.htm
certainly does not specifiy the gender of the assaulter.

http://www.showme.net/~capegadm/pa/INETDOMESTICVIO%20ARREST.htm

I see that some of the Domestic Violence Centers in Missouri whose
webpages I pulled up do not use the term 'battered woman's shelter'
anymore. Now it's just 'family violence'.

Several years ago there was a men's group who protested that there was
no 'battered men's shelters' and talked about filing a lawsuit.

I would really push the matter, Jim. I wonder if a civil suit for
damages, pain and suffering could be filed. Have you gotten a
restraining order? No one should get away with assaulting another.

Safety Articles | News in English | 20lbs in 30 days | Bluegrass | Usenet Newsfeeds